It sounds like a protected class of people which is kinda strange. I’m not arguing against protections but I will state the obvious. To protect one class means to control another (either way you cut it) and many will argue the merits of such a system as would I but that is the reality of it. That makes no sense. When it comes to public accommodations (things available to everyone in the public) discrimination is wrong, period, full stop. Protecting against discrimination in no way leads to the control of another. Explain, if you can. Kate Williams oh please. Nice spin but you know. Half the point of the “equality” law is to attack religious rights. And secondary to make gay and trans the right to discriminate and dominate women and other groups. Steve Pest, wtf are you even saying. Equality laws are about equal access under the Donkey On the naughty list and I regret nothing shirt, nothing to do with attacking religious rights. And, how the fuck do gay and trans discriminate and dominate women and other groups. You are one confused person. It is and has been for much of history straight men, especially religious straight men that have discriminated against women and others. Shalyce sam machine, I don’t doubt it. Strange Democrat invention. The rules read that it’s the right of the winning party to ferry and districts. Liberal rules. Most liberal bases see it as GOP cheating because when liberals lose they party started calling foul. Neglecting to mention they do it also. Gop did not cry foul because that was the rules. They still try to gerrymandered districts by using “fairness” as a cover. But yes, strange and crazy. Dustin Clark, lol you are saying, I sound like a liberal? Interesting. But you realize that since all we’re doing is expressing a desire to kill those who you don’t like, my position is very good and on point. I’sure you are just tired and that’s why it was too complicated for you. A bit of rest and it will make sense.